The Disillusionment of the Dominant Female

Here is an excellent piece written by Nirpal Dhaliwal on How Feminism Destroyed Real Men.  He details the plight of the modern dominant woman in trying to find satisfaction in marriage to the “male” products of feminism.  As usual, we have had to import our real men, since the average western male has been despoiled of his masculinity.  It makes a number of strong points but I’ll let it speak for itself:

Women thought the last victory of equality was to make men more ’sensitive’. The bitter irony, says this male writer in a piece that will infuriate the opposite sex (including his wife Liz Jones), is women don’t like wimps after all…

At a dinner party recently, I encountered the depressingly familiar sight of a dynamic thirty- something woman accompanied by a nerdy male sidekick that she’d browbeaten into proposing to her.

The mismatch in power was obvious. She was successful, ambitious and confident; he was a diffident, overweight, shrinking violet who measured every word he spoke in case he said anything remotely contentious that might offend her.

On her wedding finger was the most enormous, glittering engagement ring. A mutual friend later told me she’d initially been presented with a less garish but more exquisite diamond but had told her fiance to return it to the shop and get her something bigger.

That huge diamond was his declaration of surrender in the sex war. But I didn’t feel sorry for the stupid sap; he should have been man enough to tell her to get lost and find some other dummy.

Instead, he’d been sucker-punched into a lifetime of nagging and neglect, and looking at his bossy wife-to-be parading her huge rock, I felt a shiver of pre-emptive schadenfreude.

Her smug smile might have given the impression that her glossy-magazine-inspired life was all going to plan, but I could see the tragedy to come.

One day she’ll realise how dull and unfulfilling it is to have a man who doesn’t answer back, who offers no challenge or danger – but by then she’ll be over the hill and stuck with him for fear of being left on the shelf. Sadly, this is the state of many marriages today.

Back in the Nineties, emboldened by the successes of feminism, women sought to slay the dragon of patriarchy by turning men into ridiculous cissies who would cry with them through chick-flicks and then cook up a decent lasagne.

Suddenly, women wanted to drive home their newfound equality by moulding men to be more like them.

This velvet revolution was reflected in a series of broader cultural changes. After decades of uncompromising movie heroes like Marlon Brando and Clint Eastwood, we were asked to fall for stuttering, floppy-haired fops like Hugh Grant; touchy-feely and hopelessly embarrassed around women.

No doubt at the time, millions of misguided single women thought that having a man who could feel their pain and emote for Britain was a Good Thing.

Now, over a decade later, women are waking up to the fact that these men are drippy, sexless bores. The feminisation of men hasn’t produced the well-rounded uber-males women were hoping for.

Instead, women are now lumped with flabby invertebrates, little more than doormats, whom they secretly despise but are too proud to admit it.

Rather than partnership, professional women tend to seek dominance in a relationship. They map their lives out early on and pursue their dream of ‘having it all’ with cold-blooded ruthlessness.

Young women have a crystal-clear agenda: they want the career, the wardrobe, the smartly furnished house, the 4×4 and the cute kids they’ll ferry in it to expensive schools. No man is going to get in their way; and the men they choose for themselves are pliant and feeble enough to facilitate that programme.

Concentrating so much energy on work and family matters requires these women to pick a man who is predictable and secure, who won’t upset the apple cart by pursuing dreams and instincts of his own.

These are cardboard cut-out men who gush with empathy whenever their wives and girlfriends need to dump their professional stresses and female angst on them: weak and soulless men who haven’t the guts to make a mark themselves, who take the passenger seat in their women’s juggernaut journey to post-feminist Nirvana.

But having ticked off the various items on their life checklist, women are left with a nagging sense of dissatisfaction. Where was the drama? Where was the passion? Where was the stimulation and growth?

It was all forsaken for an anodyne, materialistic shopping spree that is a Good Thing. ultimately a poor substitute for a real life. These women consider themselves to be alpha-females, but they are nothing but a pathetic sham.

A true Amazon couldn’t stand the company of a supplicant male, let alone marry one. Real alpha-women are the ones who can more than hold their own with an alpha-man.

Deep down, women love men who stand up to them, who won’t be pushed around. They love men who will look them in the eye and tell them to shut up when their hormonal bickering has become too much.

They love men who will draw a line in the sand and walk out on them when they’ve had enough. They love men who know their own minds and are man enough to stick to their guns.

I’m always telling my wife, the writer Liz Jones, to shut up. She gets into a prissy huff about it, but I know she respects me for not indulging her neuroticism. Long ago, I realised it is unhealthy for a man to embroil himself in arguments with women.

While men want an argument to make sense and have a rational conclusion, women solely want the argument itself: it’s a pressure valve for their emotions, and once they get started there is no stopping them.

I have a very low boredom threshold; I can’t bear having protracted discussions about where my wife and I ‘are going’. Nor can I bear to listen to the gossipy, highly detailed ‘He said, she said’ monologues that women drift into when telling you about their day.

I deal with these elements of the female personality with impassive indifference. People might call me a sexist pig, but I am the opposite. I love women, and I love my wife because she is brilliant and incredibly strong.

I am a true feminist, because I only want to be with a powerful and capable woman. No sexist could cope with having a wife as intelligent and independent as mine.

Our relationship would never have worked had I been an effete New Man, desperately wanting to sympathise with the female condition.

My wife would have grown to loathe me for my fawning cowardice. She is a warrior and she needs to be with someone who is a match for her. Knowing the limits of what I will deal with in a relationship, I maintain my self-respect and, accordingly, gain hers.

Men are now generally terrified of women. They hold their tongues for fear of being misinterpreted as sexist; they constantly attempt to secondguess their partner in order to avoid giving offence.

They preen themselves with groaning shelves full of beauty products so they won’t incur derision and scorn. They suppress their masculinity and present themselves as cuddly Mr Nice Guys, and won’t project self- confidence in case it’s regarded as unreconstructed machismo.

This backfiring feminist conspiracy has, of course, developed hand in hand with the march of raging political correctness in Britain. The two have combined like some potent chemical reaction to explode in the faces of a generation of women who thought that a ‘moulded’ man would make for a desirable one.

In recent years, men have been trained like circus seals to be inoffensive to women, and no longer know how to entice them and turn them on.

But women secretly long for a man with swagger, who is cocky and selfassured and has the cheek to stand up them and make fun of their feminine foibles.

They long for the rakish charm of a man who knows there’s a whole ocean of fish out there, who isn’t afraid of being himself in case he is rejected.

The truth is, a real man doesn’t care what any woman thinks of him. He doesn’t care what anyone thinks of him: he answers solely to his spirit.

Real men don’t pretend or even try to understand women. They simply love them for being the mysterious, capricious creatures that they are. And they don’t take them too seriously, either. They know the vicissitudes of the female mind, its constant insecurities and the fluctuations in mood.

Rather than pander to them, they simply watch them drift by like so many clouds on the horizon. They don’t get entangled in a woman’s feelings and listen to her prattling on and on until she’s talked herself out. Such strong and stoic men are exactly what women need to anchor themselves amid the chaos of their emotions.

Sometimes my wife bemoans my detachment and laissez-faire attitude to our marriage and wishes I were more wrapped up in her. I tell her she would soon get bored of it, because men who put women on a pedestal can’t make love to them in the way that women want.

A man who is too in awe of his woman isn’t going to tear her blouse open and ravish her on the couch; he isn’t going to pull her hair and whisper profanities in her ear. Whenever my marriage is at a crisis point, and my wife’s ego and mine are jostling for a position of supremacy, we inevitably have strenuous, battling sex.

My wife is older and more successful than I am, but the bedroom has always been the arena in which I have brought her down to earth.

The female orgasm is the natural mechanism by which men assert dominion over women: a man who appreciates this can negotiate whatever difficulties arise in his relationships with them.

Last Christmas, my wife threw me out after discovering I’d been cheating on her. On the night we got back together, I made strong, passionate love to her. Unfaithful as I’d been, I was not going to let her have me over a barrel for the rest of our marriage. I needed to keep a sense of self and not allow her to mire me in guilt and a desperate quest of forgiveness.

I needed to let her know what she would be missing if we broke up for ever. I gave her a manful bravura performance that night, and at the height of her passion, I asked her: ‘Who’s the boss?’

The question threw her. Initially she wouldn’t give me a reply, but I enticed it from her. ‘You are,’ she finally gasped. ‘You are!’ I am a very difficult man to be with. I know I have caused my wife great pain and anxiety. But she is an adult, and ultimately it is wholly her choice whether she wants to be with me or not – I cannot be anyone other than myself.

I don’t believe in working on relationships and making artificial efforts to give them substance. I believe in people being themselves and following their hearts towards whatever destiny lies before them.

When women choose to be with New Men, they are choosing a life that will be only half-lived. I think a lot of them are finally waking up to that fact. Relationships between independent and assertive people will always be fraught with tensions, but they have enormous creative energy.

Despite the many problems my wife and I have endured, we have both come a long way since we first met six years ago.

We have challenged one another to grow – professionally, intellectually, emotionally and spiritually. This would never have happened had she flaked out and gone for a softer option in her choice of partner.

Bring back the real men, girls. You might just remember why you loved them in the first place.

He hits on a number of points I have made here myself.

  • Successful women who wait to marry end up having to choose from the shapeless invertebrate world-of-warcraft playing types sad enough to have them and tolerate their domineering.
  • The beta “nice-guy” who is pliant and supplicating can never win the respect of his wife, she will always loath and resent him.
  • She finds him dull and unfulfilling and will likely step out on him.
  • The idea that women can train or mold a man to their liking is self-defeating.  If he complies she will hate him.
  • Women plan their lives according to a script, and are casting for the role of leading man.  This takes priority over her interest in you as an individual.
  • Dominant women need a guy who lacks the drive and ambition to pursue his own dreams.  This is a prime example of the beta-provider.  A steadfast uninspiring chump.
  • Men must always be willing to walk away and never become desperate.  One must have limits.
  • Women like to be called on their histrionics when they are being unreasonable.  Entertaining their bullshit weakens you.
  • Being a strong man who recognizes gender differences is not equal to misogyny despite the shrill cries to the contrary.
  • Living in fear of women’s ire and abiding by PC mores causes nothing but shame and emasculation.  Men must be unapologetically forthright.
  • Women secretly adore the cocky Alpha in their heart of hearts.  Social engineering changes nothing but what is said.
  • Do not engage women in argument or debate as this belies insecurity.  Merely state your position and hold the line firmly.  You must be the rock that their waves of emotion break upon.  This fosters positive associations to you rather than negative ones.  This is always the goal.
  • Always take the lead and be the boss or she will have to step up in your place and won’t be likely to step back down.

Quite a litany of advice, but each one is a gem.  Implement these in your own life to ensure a harmonious relationship and the adoration by your woman for your Alpha status.  The long-term success of your relationship depends on it.

14 Responses to “The Disillusionment of the Dominant Female”

  1. This is good advice.

    Nirpal Dhaliwal and Liz Jones had an odd marriage though:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-456919/Liz-Jones-cheating-husband-speaks-divorce.html

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-456237/Liz-Jones-Im-finally-finally-finally-divorcing-husband.html

    She was 14 years older and much more established than Nirpal Dhaliwal. He basically was a house husband that did all the cooking (plus wrote his first novel). It looks like they did a lot of arguing in the press.

    You really shouldn’t marry a women 14 years older than you.

  2. No doubt Sfer,

    Regardless of the details however the issues he raises are legitimate. Maybe they had a greencard wedding? One thing you can say about their situation though is that if he successfully averted the domination of a wife 14 years his senior and with more money, he knows his stuff. I am not at all surprised he was cheating though. I guess she didn’t hold him to a pre-nup.

  3. “whom they secretly despise but are too proud to admit it.”
    truer words were never spoken, and….women by nature are passionate creatures. a man devoid of fire will inevitably be resented for boring her, not being willing to fuck her like a whore, and she will rationalize that cheating on him was justified.

  4. Finding a way to justify doing what one wants rather than what is right is a hallmark of this. They don’t even bother to hide it. Women will or won’t do something on this logic. Doesn’t matter if it’s fair, equitable or whatever, don’t expect tit for tat to be a two way street.

  5. I love life.

  6. “He basically was a house husband that did all the cooking (plus wrote his first novel).”

    Congrats, you admire a guy who cooks and cleans for his wife while she’s out there making money to buy him toys. And you don’t even wince when confronted with the fact.

    My husband is the epitome of the nice guy/ “beta male” you despise. He’s in awe of me, he pleases me, listens to what I say and is never condescending. I like pleasing him like a geisha would when the mood strikes. And he also ravishes me every night like there’s no tomorrow.

    The article you quote was written by a loser who desperately needs to cling to the idea a man cannot possibly be in awe of a woman and want to fuck her like a whore at the same time. That’s the relationship he has with his wife.

    I’m all for manly men and girly women and for the seduction game, but if you think the “nice guys finish last, you gotta treat her like a bad boy” DOESN’T sound whiny and bitchy, you’re mistaken.

    Wake up before you pass the opportunity of meeting great women (who either want to marry or not).

  7. Congrats, you have found an undemanding man to put you on a pedestal, too bad you will lose respect for him if you have not already. In awe of you? That hardly sounds like a marriage of equals, just wait until the denouement. Nice guys are wimpy and the vast majority of women admire strength in a man. If you are an exception, I guess you’re lucky to have found a man in whom you inspire “awe.” I’m sure the ravishing will pass in due time as you lose respect for him if you aren’t already embellishing the facts.

    As for the author, in his relationship he made a number of errors, firstly marrying a woman his senior and superior in income. Nonetheless he is able to keep her interested which is an achievement. I wouldn’t recommend trying this strategy if happiness is one’s goal but that’s not to say it couldn’t happen.

    Don’t worry about my prospects, my eyes are wide open and I prefer to inspire the awe myself.

  8. What I’m saying is that MANY women think the “you got be an alpha!” sounds whiny. Extremely whiny and off-putting.

    My marriage is not a marriage of equals: he´s a man. I´m a woman. He´s strong and manly and at the same time he adores me.

    The only times I´ve lost (momentarily) respect for him were the times he treated me like the guy in the article says men should treat women: ignoring them.

    Many interesting women are turned off by that attitude of the “pick-up artist” (who is basically a loser who fucks insecure chicks). The moment they realize he’s playing according to the rules of a bad high-school love drama film, they get bummed out. And turn to the oh-so-disdained “beta male”.

    Women hate whininess above all else. The “alpha dominance” shtick DOES sound whiny – like some kind of unnatural “retaliation” for something the man doesn’t have in him in the first place.

  9. For most people self-improvement is a process. There’s no retaliatory aspect to learning to live better and meet your needs. Nobody has to be an alpha and I’m not saying everyone should be. There is a balance between alpha and beta, and you’re right, when women approach the end of their marketability as top-shelf they do turn to betas because they see them as long-term candidates versus short term, and they want to cash in their chips while they can still get top dollar. If one wants to get laid rather than married however, the alpha characteristics will accomplish this. It’s well documented that women seek alpha men for short-term dalliance and beta men for relationship. However you care to define whiny most women don’t view alpha males as whiny or they wouldn’t be attracted to them. In fact, betas are much more likely to be whiny, emotionally manipulative and passive aggressive. What I present here goes far beyond being a “pick-up artist.” A classic PUA is often someone who has to resort to deception to get laid, because they don’t have the inner character to back up what it takes to get women attracted naturally. Men stand to gain something from that community to get them through the learning curve but the endgame should be to be naturally sexually attractive to women. When you are an alpha you don’t have to resort to such ploys to get female attention, and the women you attract will likewise have inner character to back up their game.

  10. Greatness: “You must be the rock that their waves of emotion break upon.”

  11. I think your article has swung the pendulum to the other end of the spectrum. I have been the nice guy; now I’m pursuing my dreams and certainly don’t care what women think of me.

    However, I feel that to blend the two is how to win the minds and hearts of women, that is, to be a nice guy with bad boy qualities. To clarify, I mean treat women with a degree of respect, empathy and equality, but to actually BE confident, somewhat cocksure, gutsy and significantly selfish.

    I find this works an absolute treat. They say nice guys finish last, but so do bad boys ultimately. Blend the two if you can. They both show strength.

  12. Of course the basics of civility and respect where deserved should be afforded to men and women alike. The key is not treating women solicitously and more specially than you would any other friend. The golden rule and developing integrity and character are prerequisites to becomeing a leader of men, which is a true Alpha. To some extent you can fake it til you make it, but the wise will see though you. You can sometimes bend psychologically unhealthy women to your will without civility, but they are damaged goods and more trouble/risk than they are worth. In the end the edgy and charismatic man with character and integrity will win more hearts than the others of either extreme, either sociopathic or milquetoast.

  13. Ah great. Another expert who’s figured out what it means to be a “real man”.

    Here’s something real for you:
    I’m sick and tired of people telling me what I should be and do in order to qualify as a real man.
    I’m sick of people thrusting gender obligations onto me.
    I’m sick of women who, just because they want a ‘daddy’ think that anyone who doesn’t match that profile, is a wimp or not real or whatever.

    What the hell qualifies you to make such bold, totalitarian claims about the entire population? (don’t answer that)

    So stop bloody well telling us what to do and how to behave……. if its not too much trouble.

    Peace.

  14. Another satisfied customer. Keep reading Adi.

Leave a Reply