Civics, Stewardship and Manhood ~ The American Way

The crisis in Haiti is devastating and consumes much of the news hour these past days, and well it should.  We Americans pride ourselves in doing good and valuing life and humanitarian principles.  Our response in such times is an outpouring of support and service.  While there are always delays and issues in organizing massive relief efforts, we do a great deal of good and are among the first responders around the world.  Humanitarian motives are behind much of our foreign policy and behind the wars we have entered.  We have strong egalitarian and democratic ideals as a nation.  For this we can be proud.  It is our way; the American way.  Will Herberg put it better than I could when he said:

The American Way of life is individualistic, dynamic, pragmatic. It affirms the supreme value and dignity of the individual; it stresses incessant activity on his part, for he is never to rest but is always to be striving to “get ahead”; it defines an ethic of self-reliance, merit, and character, and judges by achievement: “deeds, not creeds” are what count. The “American Way of Life” is humanitarian, “forward-looking”, optimistic. Americans are easily the most generous and philanthropic people in the world, in terms of their ready and unstinting response to suffering anywhere on the globe. The American believes in progress, in self-improvement, and quite fanatically in education. But above all, the American is idealistic. Americans cannot go on making money or achieving worldly success simply on its own merits; such “materialistic” things must, in the American mind, be justified in “higher” terms, in terms of “service” or “stewardship” or “general welfare”… And because they are so idealistic, Americans tend to be moralistic; they are inclined to see all issues as plain and simple, black and white, issues of morality.

What a passage.  Who couldn’t feel a surge of patriotism and pride in reading this description?  Moreover, these ideals highlight the very reasons for past American prosperity. 

Of late the American prosperity engine seems to have derailed however.  Our economy continues to suck wind as our deficits grow and record unemployment plagues our collective productivity.  What is wrong here?  I believe recent trends have reduced our feelings of civic responsibility and our dedication to our collective good.  For most of our nation’s history, manhood was defined, among other things, as a responsibility to community, as well as self, family and nation.  Our increasingly separated lives have eroded our communities and throughout the nation from the micro to the macro scale, self interest has eclipsed a sense of civic duty and authentic patriotism.  Our leaders, our corporations, and yes even our very selves have thrown this value under the bus in the pursuit of our own piece of the pie at any cost.  Excessive materialism has led for many of us, to the erosion of our humanitarian sensibilities and willingness to give back to our communities and our nation and the world at large.  Our response to Haiti and other disasters shows that this spirit is not dead, but other factors show it is indeed ailing.  We discard a sense of civic duty and duty to the community at our own peril.  Man evolved as a leader and protector for the community.  What greater sacrifice than the heroic man who gives his life to the protection of his tribe or nation?  How can we consider ourselves men at all without embracing our obligation to the larger community?  There is no future and no fulfillment in the craven heartless pursuit of the self alone.  A nation without a collective identity and will, without a value system we can all embrace, has no future. 

I believe that the rampant corporate malfeasance that has led to our economic malaise, in large part due to the banks but by no means isolated therein.  This loss of respect and a sense of duty to all stakeholders in an organization has led to corporations who have no sense of responsibility to their employees and cut them loose to their own detriment to boost short term profits.  It has led to corporations who have no sense of duty to their nation and seek to cheat us out of their taxes rightfully owed.  It has led to corporations, even, who have no sense of duty to their very masters, the shareholders, whom they ostensibly serve.  Take as a case in point Goldman Sachs, who this year paid more in bonuses than they earned for the year.  Who, exactly, exists to serve whom?  Why is a binding shareholder vote on executive compensation even up for discussion?  Shareholders own the business and damn well should have the final word in compensation?  These rapacious executives are lapdogs run amok.  They need to be shown the firm guidance of a master who is empowered to muzzle them.  Our politicians are cast from the same mould.  Far from serving us, the speak platitudes while being paid off by corporations to gut the very legislation meant to reign in these excesses.  This has to stop and it all comes out of a lack of any sense of civic duty or even decency.  Our greed has gotten out of control and has gutted this fine nation of ours.  We must put a stop to this malarkey and quickly if we stand any chance of passing our pride in America to our offspring.  For our collective sake I hope we manage this feat.

This journal article similarly suggests that our corporations serve a role in forming individual morality and duties.  In an ostensibly free market such as ours, they hold a magnified importance and we must work to ensure that these enterprises exist to serve their stakeholders, not the other way round:

By KLAUS SCHWAB

Few things have captured the attention of the public as much in recent weeks as the issue of excessive bonuses for corporate executives. This discussion is being conducted in a very emotional way, driven by factors such as greed, envy and moral outrage.

Nevertheless, the discussion is superficial, as it doesn’t consider the essential point of the matter—namely the role that companies (including banks) play in society and the role of executives within these companies. The bonus discussion is just a symbol of a much deeper transformation that has taken place in the business world.

Almost 40 years ago, I first developed the “stakeholder theory” for businesses at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. This considers the enterprise as a community with a number of stakeholders—in other words, social groups that are directly and indirectly connected to the enterprise and that are dependent on its success and prosperity. These groups include employees, customers, suppliers, the state and especially the society in which the enterprise is active.

The idea at the core of the Davos meetings was to create a platform where managers could meet their stakeholders and discuss their mutual responsibility. According to the stakeholder approach, the top management of the enterprise acts as a trustee for all stakeholders—and not just the trustee of the shareholders. It is based on the principle that each individual is embedded in societal communities in which the common good can only be promoted through the interaction of all participants.

We have witnessed a gradual erosion of this communitarian spirit over the past years. This has been visible not only in business, but also in politics and other areas. The erosion of societal values has progressed to a great extent in business, and it is one of the primary reasons of the current economic crisis.

In the last few years, the business enterprise has been transformed from a purposeful unit to a purely functional unit. The purpose of an enterprise—to create goods and services for the common good—has been replaced by a purely functional enterprise philosophy aimed at maximizing profits in the shortest time possible. But if management decision-making processes are decoupled from the responsibility of managers for their own risk-taking, then the entrepreneurial system is being perverted.

In this context, the enterprise is no longer an organic community. It becomes instead a functional “profit-generating machine” in which all parts that do not fulfill their purpose, including managers, employees, products, locations, etc., are replaceable. This development was particularly visible in the financial sector, where there is at best only an indirect connection with the original purpose of an enterprise, meaning the creation of substantive, real value.

This has consequences for individual behavior. One cannot expect anything other than selfish thinking and action from an individual who knows that he or she is replaceable at any time. Instead of a world that is guided by a communitarian sense of duty vis-à-vis society, there is a rise of individualistic profit-seeking behavior in which society plays only a secondary role.

The current crisis should actually be a warning shot for us to fundamentally rethink the development of our morals, our ethical norms, and the regulatory mechanisms that underpin our economy, politics and global interconnectedness. It would be a wasted opportunity for all of us if we pretended that the crisis was simply a bad dream, especially now that we are beginning to see the first signs of improvement in rising share prices or quarterly profits returning to banks—with corresponding bonuses.

Unfortunately, the reality from which we are still hiding looks very different. The financial crisis has led to an increasing level of unemployment that will remain with us for years to come; it will also put an enormous pressure on public goods and services as governments are forced to pay off their ballooning debts.

The billions that are needed to pay off the debts will lead to higher taxes, reductions of social and public health systems as well as reduced investments in education and infrastructure. In the end, it is the taxpayer, the average citizen, who has to shoulder the costs of the crisis by a reduction of his or her disposable income.

There is a real danger that the financial and economic crisis will develop into a real social crisis. Difficult times lie ahead. If we want to keep society together, then a sense of community and solidarity are more important now than ever before. This communitarian spirit is the basis of the stakeholder principle. We need to embrace that stakeholder principle, not just within the narrow confines of companies, but at a national and global level as well.

From this context, the bonus discussion is just a symbol of a more fundamental question: whether we can adopt a more communitarian spirit or whether we will fall back into old habits and excesses, thereby undermining social peace.

Mr. Schwab is founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, based in Geneva, Switzerland.

The Alpha male must be a leader of men.  He must lead by example in demonstrating that the privilege endowed upon him by his peers, in making him a leader, is countervailed by his own duty to guide and protect them.  To be a man, one must be a humanitarian.  Anything else is craven and self serving and by its very essence, beta, if not omega.

14 Responses to “Civics, Stewardship and Manhood ~ The American Way”

  1. Game is about truth, and not believing pretty lies.

    I’m afraid that you are misinformed about American foreign policy.

    Perhaps you should read up on the American military interventions in Haiti.

  2. Quite true. There is little more fundamentally true than our biological heritage and high-level game leverages these biological and evolutionary facts to the advantage of he with the knowledge to implement them as tools in his arsenal. It is necessary however to delineate a boundary between game per se, and the way of the alpha male which encompasses more than getting laid. Being a true alpha male, not partly an alpha, not an alpha in some area of expertise, but an interdisciplinary alpha across all the realms of life is a set of behaviors, a philosophy, which engenders the admiration, respect, deference and allegiance of one’s peers and community. Game is the conscious leveraging, or to use and uglier word, manipulation, of the evolutionary social and behavioral artifacts of our simian roots for the purpose of garnering the resource of female reproductive availability. This is a goal of all men and a valuable skill in it’s own right, yet a beta can learn and pitch game and get women for short term couplings, without the broader character development and power that one can gain by being an alpha male. Game is a great tool in one’s development and crucial in meeting a fundamental need, yet life has many facets and mastery of others have value as well. I view game as a bridge, a means of filling a need and learning human nature that so many men desperately need, yet it is merely a stepping stone in the path of personal cultivation one may choose to follow. The path to genuine alpha maledom, which successfully achieved preempts game. Being a powerful and successful alpha male in full knowledge of the art of persuasion and with a powerful personal magnetism and indefatigable confidence brings women without effort. Become one of the top 10% and the fact of hypergamy will mean women will compete for your favor without you needing expend any effort whatsoever.

    American foreign policy, whatever it’s failings, is in fact in large part supported by the populace for humanitarian ends. Does corporate greed play a role? Of course, but the support of the people for a given effort is not awarded on the basis of shareholder dividends. Again any one action will be multifaceted, but what I described as the American spirit and motives holds for the general populace. On the other hand for one not imbued with the American culture it is valid and likely that disparate viewpoints will prevail. There is no one correct answer of viewpoint, I merely describe our prevailing view. You are more than welcome to your own.

    I am well aware of the facts of the efforts in Haiti. Our military serves humanitarian relief purposes as well as war related ones. In fact the message that our armed forces are able to respond as rapidly as they do in a relief capacity and could do the same in a conflict is not lost on anyone. Our military in Haiti provides security, human services, resources, medical treatment, an alternate air platform for staging the many resources arriving for distribution and fills a great many other needs which are not able to be fulfilled by the impoverished Haitian government such as it is. Feel free to list your specific objections to their efforts but for my money Haiti needs all the help it can get regardless of who provides it.

  3. Everytime I see one of my employees waste a company resource ( equipment, piss off customer etc) I remind them that “their” paycheck was attached to the value of that wastage. Way too many people have a don’t care attitude right now, if they don’t start to buy into the fact the business success equals their success they quickly leave our employ.

    The “pretty people” ( my word for all the state/education/municipal workers) have a real shock coming up as their golden wage/benefits/pensions are killing us as a society.

    Until we start prosucuting the people who gamed the system, we will not restore and rebuild healthy societies.

    As to Haiti, we need to help them in the aftermath, but my opinion is after that they need to stand on their own two feet. US spent 290 million last year in aid to Haiti, where is that at? Why are they not working to help themselves? I don’t support charities that only bring “aid” to an area and never bring answers to how they can do it themselves.

  4. I agree Barry. I think crisis aid like we are giving now is necessary and a human good. Welfare aid creates dependency though and is not constructive.

  5. following the tsunami, the US was the largest private and governmental donator of aid. indonesia is the largest muslim nation in the world. the rich oil emirs couldn’t be troubled to donate more than a few million. seriously.

  6. You’re confusing the primitive social construct of alpha maleness with the modern corporate-legal structures that support the leveraged massing of dangerous amounts of power.

    Would you have a tribe in which the alpha male was 500,000 times as powerful as his next rival? Would the heirarchy even function with such disparate power? A close structural analysis would suggest not.

  7. I just stumbled upon your blog and I greatly enjoyed this piece as I share much of it sentiments.

  8. When one views the issue at hand, i have to agree with your endings. You intelligibly show cognition about this matter and i have much to discover after reading your post.Lot’s of salutations and i will come back for any further updates.

  9. Leaders have a responsibility to engage and benefit their communities regardless of the power distance in the society. Simply by growing populations to the degree we have today we have widened the distance between top dog and underling. I don’t think there is any way around that. It is human nature to organize into societies and in larger ones there will be more power accumulated at the top. This is neither good nor bad, it just is. With that greater power comes greater responsibility however and we must ensure we pick leaders who respect that.

  10. The positive things supportive of society are not valued as “Alpha” by our society today; they are the province of sucker “Betas” who can be conned into doing them. Responsibility and stewardship are for losers, Alphas are the ones letting everyone else clean-up their mess. (And we wonder why things suck so badly now.)

  11. Awesome superb post bud. I’ve had a blast reading your posts and have found them awesome. Keep posting more

  12. That may be the view of many, but true Alphas are leaders and therefore help to foster strong society and community. The confusion of “bad boy” and Alpha is widespread. While the criminal element may engender some Alpha traits they are not wholely Alphas.

  13. What’s up buddy? I’ve been reading your blogs for minute now and i think this site is exceptional. I love the way you tell it like it is and how it should be. Your writing style is an inspiration to me sense I’m in college.

    Anyway I’m doing an essay for college and I was wondering if you could give me a couple of examples so i can get an idea on what to write my paper on. (research, books, personal experience) Just point me in the right direction :)

    The topic is Masculinity, and how the word’s meaning changes when used by different groups and in different contexts.

    Any help would be greatly appreciated. 1

  14. Sure thing man. I’d check out Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man By Susan Faludi for one. Though the author is a feminist she gives men a fair shake in the book and speaks to the devaluation of men and masculine roles. From an Ev. Psych. perspective you might check out Social structure and testosterone: explorations of the socio-bio-social chain By Theodore D. Kemper. Also the Robert Green books such as the The 48 laws of power By Robert Greene, Joost Elffers are rich with historical and cultural information you could derive for your paper. Good luck.

Leave a Reply